Appeals court judge refuses to delay President-elect Trump's hush money sentencing

Category: Legal News

An appeals court judge denied Donald Trump's request to delay his sentencing in a hush money case. Trump's lawyers filed a lawsuit claiming presidential immunity and arguing that the jury's verdict was erroneous due to evidence related to official acts. Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records linked to a payment to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election. The judge indicated that Trump may receive an unconditional discharge, avoiding prison time.

Keywords: Donald Trump, hush money case, presidential immunity

Source: ABC7 Los Angeles

Update At: 1/8/2025

Related Sources

Vybz Kartel free: Dancehall star to be released after years behind bars

The Jamaica Court of Appeal has ordered the release of Vybz Kartel and his three co-defendants after years in prison, concluding that a retrial is not necessary. The court cited concerns over Kartel's health and the psychological and financial effects of continued incarceration. Kartel, who has maintained his innocence, was convicted in 2014 for the murder of Clive 'Lizard' Williams, a case based largely on circumstantial evidence. His conviction was quashed earlier this year, leading to this recent decision.

FOX 5 NY

Vybz Kartel Freed After Appeals Court Declines to Retry Murder Charges

A Jamaican court of appeals declined to retry Vybz Kartel after his 2014 murder conviction was overturned, making him a free man after a decade in prison. The Privy Council found evidence of juror misconduct in the initial trial, leading to the decision that a new trial was not necessary.

Rolling Stone

Vybz Kartel Released From Prison After Appeals Court Denies Retrial

The Jamaican Court of Appeal denied Kartel's appeal in 2020, but the UK Privy Council later overturned his conviction due to juror misconduct. The Court of Appeal ruled against a retrial, leading to the release of Kartel and two others, while one remains in custody for a separate case.

iHeartRadio

The morning read for Thursday, August 1

A selection of news articles and commentary related to recent Supreme Court decisions, including discussions on immunity rulings and the implications of term limits.

SCOTUSblog

Michigan Supreme Court Reinstates Expanded Paid Sick Leave and Minimum Wage Requirements | Barnes & Thornburg

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the Michigan Legislature violated the state constitution by amending the Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act and the Earned Sick Time Act. The original laws will take effect on February 21, 2025, replacing the amended minimum wage law and Paid Medical Leave Act. This decision imposes significant new requirements for employers, including higher minimum wage rates and expanded paid sick leave provisions.

Barnes & Thornburg

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused as the main plotter of 9/11, agrees to plead guilty

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and two accomplices have agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and murder charges in exchange for life sentences, avoiding a death penalty trial. This decision marks a significant development in the long-standing legal battle surrounding the 9/11 attacks, with family members of victims expressing mixed feelings about the plea deals. The defendants will be required to answer questions from victim families as part of the settlement, which aims to provide some closure to the case that has been ongoing for two decades.

OPB News

Yes, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Deserves to Die. It’s Still Good He Won’t Be Executed.

The U.S. government has reached a plea deal with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two co-conspirators of the 9/11 attacks, allowing them to plead guilty in exchange for avoiding the death penalty. This decision has sparked outrage among victims' families and opponents of the death penalty, raising complex questions about justice, punishment, and the implications of executing terrorists. The plea deal includes a process for the terrorists to respond to questions about their roles in the attacks, but sentencing hearings are not expected until 2025.

Slate Magazine

Google Loses DOJ Antitrust Suit Over Search

A federal judge ruled that Google's payments to maintain its search engine as the default on smartphone browsers violate US antitrust law, marking a significant win for the Justice Department.

Bloomberg.com

CVS Investors Have Opportunity to Lead CVS Health Corporation Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

CVS Health Corporation faces a class action lawsuit for misleading investors regarding its financial forecasts and profitability, particularly in its Health Care Benefits division. Investors who purchased CVS securities between May 3, 2023, and April 30, 2024, are encouraged to join the lawsuit to recover losses incurred due to false statements made by the company.

marketscreener.com

CVS Investors Have Opportunity to Lead CVS Health Corporation Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

A class action lawsuit has been filed against CVS Health Corporation for misleading investors regarding its financial performance and forecasts. Investors who purchased CVS securities between May 3, 2023, and April 30, 2024, are encouraged to join the lawsuit to recover losses incurred due to false statements made by the company.

PR Newswire