Madigan defense seeks to cut counts after SCOTUS bribery ruling

Category: Legal News

Ex-House Speaker Michael Madigan's defense argues for dismissal of 14 indictment counts based on a recent Supreme Court decision that clarified the federal bribery statute. The decision impacts the case by requiring proof of a corrupt state of mind and a quid pro quo. The defense claims prosecutors failed to show corrupt intent. The Supreme Court's ruling has significant implications for Chicago's political corruption cases.

Keywords: Michael Madigan, Supreme Court decision, Federal bribery statute, Political corruption, Chicago Tribune

Source: Chicago Tribune

Update At: 7/16/2024

Related Sources

Defense attempts to paint Daniel Penny as a savior in closing arguments of his trial

Daniel Penny is on trial for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man, during a subway incident in May 2023. The prosecution argues that Penny acted recklessly and used excessive force, while the defense claims he was acting to protect passengers from a perceived threat. Closing arguments highlighted differing views on the necessity and duration of the chokehold, with the jury expected to deliberate soon.

ABC News

Self-defense or too much force? Jurors face tough question as Daniel Penny trial wraps

Closing arguments in the trial of Marine veteran Daniel Penny, charged with choking homeless man Jordan Neely to death on a subway, highlight contrasting views on self-defense and recklessness. The defense argues Penny acted to protect passengers, while prosecutors claim his actions were excessive and led to Neely's death. The case has sparked debates on race, public safety, and mental health.

NBC New York

Both sides give closing arguments in NYC subway chokehold death trial

Closing arguments were presented in the trial of Marine veteran Daniel Penny, charged with choking homeless man Jordan Neely to death on a subway. The defense argued Penny acted in self-defense for fellow passengers, while prosecutors claimed his response was excessive and reckless. The case has sparked debates on race, public safety, and mental health, with differing public opinions on Penny's actions.

WABC-TV

Daniel Penny trial enters closing arguments in Jordan Neely's subway chokehold death

Daniel Penny, a Marine veteran, is on trial for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a subway. The defense argues that Neely's death was due to multiple factors, including his mental health issues, and claims Penny acted in self-defense. The prosecution contends that Penny used excessive force and was aware of the consequences of his actions. The trial has drawn significant media attention and public protests regarding mental health responses in the city.

CBS Denver

Closing arguments in the NYC subway chokehold trial start today. Here’s how we got here

The trial of Daniel Penny, a former Marine charged with manslaughter for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a subway, has reached closing arguments. The defense claims Penny acted in self-defense to protect passengers, while the prosecution argues he acted recklessly and failed to show remorse. The case raises significant issues regarding mental health, race, and vigilante justice, with jurors now tasked with determining the legality of Penny's actions.

CNN

Daniel Penny returns to court for start of closing arguments in subway chokehold trial

Daniel Penny's trial for manslaughter resumes, with closing arguments expected after Thanksgiving. Penny, a Marine Corps veteran, faces charges for the death of Jordan Neely, a mentally ill homeless man who threatened subway passengers. The defense argues Penny's actions were justified, while the prosecution claims he used excessive force. The case has racial undertones, with witnesses describing their fear during the incident. The jury will deliberate after receiving instructions from the judge.

Fox News

NYC jury deadlocked in Daniel Penny subway chokehold trial

The jury in the Daniel Penny trial is deadlocked on the first charge of second-degree manslaughter, leading the judge to issue an Allen charge to encourage a unanimous verdict. The defense argues Penny acted in self-defense against Jordan Neely, who was exhibiting erratic behavior. If found guilty, Penny could face up to 15 years in prison. The trial has included testimonies from witnesses and experts, with both sides acknowledging that Penny had the right to intervene but disagreeing on the level of force used.

FOX 5 Atlanta

Federal appeals court upholds rapidly approaching TikTok ban • Idaho Capital Sun

A federal appeals court ruled that the law requiring TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell the service or face a U.S. ban is constitutional. The court rejected arguments that the law violates free speech rights, stating it aims to protect U.S. citizens from data gathering by the Chinese government. TikTok may appeal the ruling, which is set to take effect on January 19, the day before Trump retakes office. Bipartisan leaders support the decision, emphasizing national security concerns.

Idaho Capital Sun

A Federal Appeals Court Just Upheld the TikTok Ban. Here’s What Could Happen Next

A federal appeals court upheld a law that may lead to TikTok's ban in the U.S. due to national security concerns. The court's decision allows the law to stand, potentially forcing TikTok to sell its U.S. operations or face being blocked. TikTok argues this violates free speech rights, and the case may escalate to the Supreme Court.

WIRED

Read the full federal indictment of Boston City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson

Fernandes Anderson has been indicted on multiple counts related to wire fraud and theft involving federal funds. A press conference is scheduled for further details.

Boston.com