Aaron Sorkin Backpedals Earlier Op-Ed Piece Claiming Democrats Should Nominate Mitt Romney

Category: Politics

Aaron Sorkin published an op-ed suggesting Democrats nominate Mitt Romney for the presidential race, reflecting on a plot from 'The West Wing.' He later retracted his statement after President Biden endorsed Kamala Harris following his withdrawal from the race.

Keywords: Aaron Sorkin, Mitt Romney, 2024 Presidential Race

Source: IndieWire

Update At: 7/22/2024

Related Sources

How 1975 sparked the state Vermonters are in today

George Aiken's retirement in 1975 marked the end of an era in Vermont politics, transitioning from a Republican stronghold to a more progressive state. Over the past 50 years, Vermont has undergone significant changes in its political landscape, culture, and infrastructure, influenced by figures like Bernie Sanders and events like Watergate. The state faces ongoing challenges related to development, environmental protection, and social issues, with residents looking to the legislature for solutions.

vtdigger.org

Social Media Giggles At Congress' Reaction To Matt Gaetz's Absence

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz faced mockery after announcing he would not serve in the 119th Congress, following a report of substantial evidence against him for violating House rules. His resignation and the House clerk's description of him as 'honorable' sparked reactions from Congress members and social media.

Yahoo! Maktoob News

Federal courts won’t refer Clarence Thomas for DOJ investigation

The federal courts have declined to refer complaints against Justice Clarence Thomas regarding ethics violations to the Department of Justice. The Judicial Conference rejected requests from Democratic lawmakers to investigate claims of undisclosed luxury travel and gifts. Senior U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad, Jr. stated that Thomas had amended his financial disclosures, addressing some concerns, but raised doubts about the Conference's authority to make such referrals. Similar complaints against Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson were also dismissed, with both justices having filed amended disclosures.

SCOTUSblog

Federal courts won't refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to attorney general over ethics

The federal courts will not refer allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas regarding ethics violations to the Justice Department. Thomas has agreed to follow updated reporting requirements for trips and gifts. The Supreme Court adopted its first code of ethics in 2023, but it lacks enforcement mechanisms. Concerns were raised by Democratic senators about accountability for ethics violations, while a conservative group also filed a complaint regarding Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's disclosures.

The Associated Press

How Clarence Thomas Got Away With It

Justice Clarence Thomas faces no accountability for accepting lavish gifts and failing to disclose them, as the Judicial Conference declines to refer him for investigation. This decision undermines the Ethics in Government Act and highlights the lack of repercussions for judicial misconduct, particularly in the context of campaign finance law and the influence of wealthy benefactors.

Slate Magazine

Justice Clarence Thomas avoids ethics federal probe

The U.S. Judicial Conference announced that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will not face a federal investigation into ethics violations related to undisclosed luxury gifts and trips from billionaire Harlan Crow. This decision follows years of scrutiny over Thomas' acceptance of gifts, which critics argue undermines public trust in the judiciary. Despite the introduction of a new ethics code in 2023, concerns about transparency and accountability persist. Thomas has amended his financial disclosures but remains under criticism from lawmakers and advocacy groups for the lack of enforcement mechanisms in the current ethics framework.

Newsweek

Democratic Senator Rips Judicial Body's Decision Not to Refer Clarence Thomas to DOJ

Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse criticized the Judicial Conference for not referring Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice over his failure to disclose luxury trips funded by billionaires. Whitehouse argued that the decision reflects a lack of accountability for ethics violations within the judicial branch. The Judicial Conference acknowledged Thomas's amended financial disclosures but expressed doubt about its authority to refer justices for investigation. The controversy highlights concerns about the integrity of the Supreme Court amid allegations of noncompliance with disclosure requirements.

Common Dreams

Analysts: South Korea's political turmoil works in China's favor

South Korea is facing a deepening political crisis with recent impeachments of its leaders, creating an opportunity for China to increase its influence. Analysts suggest that a Democratic Party government would be more conciliatory towards Beijing, potentially altering South Korea's foreign policy and undermining its relationship with the U.S. The situation remains tense as President Yoon Suk Yeol fights against anti-state forces while the opposition pushes for further investigations.

Voice of America

Clarence Thomas Avoids DOJ Referral Evoking George Costanza Defense

Clarence Thomas has faced scrutiny for failing to disclose luxury travel and gifts, raising questions about judicial accountability and the enforcement of the Ethics in Government Act. Despite allegations of violations, the Judicial Conference has opted not to refer the matter to the Department of Justice, citing confusion over the law. Critics argue this undermines the integrity of the judicial system and suggests a lack of consequences for Supreme Court justices.

Above the Law

Rep. Virginia Foxx injured outside House chamber in Capitol building

North Carolina Congresswoman Virginia Foxx was injured after falling down a marble staircase outside the House chamber. She received medical attention for minor cuts and confirmed via social media that she is doing fine.

WXII The Triad